it appears to me that the direction of this thread has gone far beyond its intended scope...
there's really no need to continue down this pointless path of condescention.
yes, there were some "off" moments of last night's performance...
yes, alcohol may be a contributing factor...
yes, there are historical occurrences that provide of valid frame of reference by which the community can make assumptions...
but is this deficit-based commentary on Scott Weiland's personal problems and the corresponding by-products that have historically mitigated the progression of the band what this thread is really intended to stimulate conversation around?
I whole-heartedly do not believe so.
good, bad or indifferent, I enjoyed myself last night... and I truly enjoyed interfacing with those BE members that I met up with.... HAWK, i looked around for you for about an hour buddy, both outside of the venue before, inside the venue during and outside of the venue afterwards.
let's wrap this thread up... and let the past be the past...