IMJ,
I don't give biased coverage to those who do favors, but I will promote money making things for them like tours. Like when we interviewed Morrissey, we promoted his tour dates a lot, since Morrissey had done an interview which financially benefited the site through ads and also in helping us book more interviews. If Morrissey's people had canceled the interview less than a day before it was scheduled, we would not have promoted his tour dates or endeavors like that in the future, but it wouldn't have affected the type of stories we regularly post on him.
Scott Weiland's people were unprofessional in canceling an interview and in their correspondences with us, so I do not post articles promoting his tour dates, but it does not make my coverage on him biased. The only people I have an issue with are Diana Barton and Lucas Keller, not Scott Weiland. If I'd bought one of those megaphones I'd probably have an issue with him.
Every story you've seen on him would still go up even if the interview had happened. The only difference is I wouldn't have ripped his management a few times (in stories that were already related to their poor management), since they would have acted professionally which means the events I reference wouldn't have occurred. Also based on their handling of the PledgeMusic stuff, their poor management goes beyond their dealings with me.