Listened to it myself. Now I'm seeing news stories all over claiming he is disrespecting PJ, and Foo Fighters.... You know, it may be the first time I've ever defended this guy, but I personally saw nothing wrong with anything he said. When I see headlines about what he said I see a media desperate to make a story out of nothing. A media trying to get you to click a link over what is ultimately advertising dollars, that's all. The guy stated his opinion, nothing wrong with that in the least bit. So what if he thinks his music is better than PJ? Good for him! There's people who prefer Bach to Brahms, jazz to blues, etc.... Hell, I like my own songs better than most PJ songs. Does that make anyone right or wrong? No, it's all just opinion and preference. Corgan also made some really valid points. He might not like PJ's tunes much which is his opinion and is perfectly fine to have. We all don't have to like them and it's perfectly okay to say so. He also states a fact though, noting they are still an arena staple, whereas he is not. I agree in the sense that a lot of their music doesn't connect with me. Sure, some of it does, but I myself much like Corgan don't feel they have the iconic rock god like status in my life which they have with others. I think the one thing I can give PJ is they are the ONLY band of the major four 1990's Seattle bands to have a continuous run all this time.As far as his statements about Foo Fighters go... Again, he doesn't really connect with what they do. So what? I'm glad at least someone is saying what they feel about them. I get that Dave Grohl is a lovable character in the story of rock history and that saying anything negative is just blasphemous to the masses. Again though, there's nothing wrong with not liking this guy's work. It's all just meaningless opinion. I personally think the very first album was great! You know, the one with the gun on it.... The one Grohl likes to deny even is an album. Color and The Shape had a few great moments too. Other than that, I can agree with Corgan that I think just about everything I've heard by this band has sounded exactly the same to me ever since about 2003 when they released "One By One" as a single. About time someone said something.Corgan is right in saying he's experimented and evolved way more than either of those bands. Doesn't mean I've liked anything he's done past about 1996 or so, but he is right about his musical evolution. He's also definitely right in indicating that those others have been way more successful than himself doing just what it is they do. Do I wish Corgan would stop calling his new music Smashing Pumpkins? Yes, that's my meaningless opinion. Again, I normally don't defend this guy and haven't liked anything I've heard from him in years; but after some of the news headlines and stories I've read about this referenced interview and after listening to it myself I just feel the headlines lack any substance and are just a means of getting us all to click on them.